Feda /dev/ - No Javascript allowed

#12239eondev:

haciendo proyectos por hobby

Mira que hay hobbies jodidos, pero lo de acabar tu jornada y seguir trabajando porque te gusta no lo entenderé en la vida.

Las contribuciones a OpenSource deberían ser porque en tu trabajo necesitas que X software tenga una funcionalidad que no tiene, la implementas para tus necesidades y de paso contribuyes al proyecto en caso de que tenga cabida.

#12252 Resumiendo, que el código OS es mejor porque ESR? xD

Ninguno de esos motivos que expones son intrínsecos al open source. El código cerrado también puede ser auditado, utilizado en miles de instancias y revisado antes de ser publicado.

Creer que la calidad de un software no es ortogonal a su modelo de licencia es fundamentalismo.

#12255 Los proyectos OS de origen comunitario y de calidad podrían ser resultado de la facilidad que da el OS de reunir a gente de gran nivel, digo yo. Vamos, desconozco la cantidad de gente que aportará a un proyecto por hobby unas horas al día y el impacto que tienen y la gente que se gana un sueldo con donaciones o lo que sea. BTW, por el hecho de ser SO tienes la posibilidad de que empresas aporten, cosa que hace más rico el software y el ecosistema.

#12256 ortopedica tienes lac ara hijo de ptua

Esta web ya no es segura, caballeros.

#12260 Mi experiencia al respecto con código propietario ha sido excelente, hablamos de fixes en cuestión de horas o un día. Desde luego mucho mejor que mendigar manitas en issues de GitHub que es lo que se destila ahora xD

#12260uchar:

si te corre prisa puedes dejar un PR abierto

Lo de prisa pues depende de lo trivial del cambio. El último fork que tuve que realizar (Traefik) me llevó más tiempo del que yo considero aceptable en un hotfix, entre adquirir conocimiento de dominio, familiarizarme con el codebase, etc.

The whole idea that anything can be so "shared" as to have no value in itself is not a problem if the rest of the world ensures that nobody is starving or needing money. For young people who have parents who pay for them or student grants or loans and basically have yet to figure out that it costs a hell of a lot of money to live in a highly advanced society, this is not such a bad idea. Grow up, graduate, marry, start a family, buy a house, have an accident, get seriously ill for a while, or a number of other very expensive things people actually do all the time, and the value of your work starts to get very real and concrete to you, at which point giving away things to be "nice" to some "community" which turns out not to be "nice" enough in return that you will actually stay alive, is no longer an option.

All of this "code sharing" is an economic surplus phenomenon. It works only when none of the people involved in it are in any form of need. As soon as the need arises, a lot of people discover that it has cost them real money to work for the community and they reap very little benefit from it, because they are sharing value-less services and getting value out of something that people take for granted is hard to impossible. This is unfortunately even more true when employees are considered "free" while consultants are not, so buying the supposed "services" from people who know the source code is not an exercised option.

Just because it is nice to get things for free does not mean it is a good idea to organize anything based on removing the value of those things, but until people need that value, getting stuff for free is so nice that looking to the future is something most people simply will not do, and those who refuse think about will also refuse to listen to those who have. Thus they will continue to deplete the value of software to the point where nobody wants to pay for any software, be it of a particular kind or in general. Software development tools are already considered to be give-aways by some people, threatening commercial vendors and those who would like to make money providing software tools to developers.

https://www.xach.com/naggum/articles/3217750625724755@naggum.net.html